Seclusion Pathway Review Audit
نویسندگان
چکیده
Aims • Ensure compliance with seclusion trust policy and guidelines by the mental health team (goal of 100 percent). Confirm that proper documentation commencement, periodic reviews, termination is always maintained (goal: Methods Retrospective collection data from one adult male Psychiatric Intensive Care unit female ward. Our sample consisted patients who were secluded between time period September 2021 June 2022. 33 episodes met this inclusion criteria. Data collected OpenRio progress notes section. We developed a tool for monitoring reviews included different about demographics other variables in reviews. Results found out following: In regard to demographics, predominant age groups are 20 40 years old, although there also an increase number people 50 70 old ethnicity was white British. The rationale start continuity documented 100% cases our episodes. initial medical review completed first hour 81.82% (27) , 18.18% (6) cases, it not within window. 4 doctor contacted meet one-hour limit. 2 episodes, reasons being late documented. hourly nursing 93.94% (31). There 6.06 % (2 episodes) completed. No specific reason missed (before MDT / consultant reviews) 24 9 when window hourly. 5 patient sleeping, so didn't contact doctor. no delay. However, extra 1-2 hours duration time. 8 26 (78.79%). 7 primary episode started on weekend afternoon or early evening after normal working day conducted next day. Two daily – at least responsible clinician (following review) : 3 (9.09%), two without documentation. Rational continue/ end each completed: 32 continue where ended doctors. Physical observations record :100% physical record. Conclusion Recommendations: Increase awareness importance completing conducting teaching sessions local academic program informal staff. Adding junior doctors handbook discuss during induction meetings. Allocate flyers posters information stations office. Completing re-audit cycle gauge scope change.
منابع مشابه
Post-Seclusion and/or Restraint Review in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.
CONTEXT It has been suggested that after an incident in which a patient has been placed in seclusion or in restraints, an intervention should be conducted after the event to ensure continuity of care and prevent recurrences. Several terms are used, and various models have been suggested for post-seclusion and/or restraint review; however, the intervention has never been precisely defined. OBJ...
متن کاملRegulatory change: a pathway to eliminating seclusion and restraint or "regulatory scotoma"?
Historical and current experience indicates that regulatory changes in seclusion and restraint practice are often spurred by patient abuse but can ultimately enhance protection for consumers, prevent use of seclusion and restraint, and help transform care so it becomes recovery oriented. Reports of deaths related to restraint and seclusion fueled recent national regulatory changes and a federal...
متن کاملA Review on Knowledge Audit Process
Knowledge audit output helps organizations to make recommendation of KM strategy which later can be used for better managing the knowledge. This paper reviews literature on knowledge audit process with the aim to understand the process, the data gathering techniques employed and the roles of knowledge audit. It aims to report the research gaps and propose directions for future research in this ...
متن کاملAudit Decisions Using Belief Functions: A Review
This article provides an overview of the audit process along with the belief-function approach to audit decisions. In particular, the article highlights the advantages of using belief functions for representing uncertainties in the audit evidence and discusses the audit risk model of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants as a plausibility model. Also, the article discusses the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Psychiatry Open
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2056-4724']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.402